PDA

View Full Version : "No rules section"

Anonymous
04-11-2007, 02:38 PM
I am suggesting a "No rules" section or something like that.
Edit: Alright fine how about a Spam section.
yanney
04-11-2007, 03:01 PM
that would be a bad idea. people would post copyright infringed things or something like that and something might happen to the site
d@nth3m@n
04-11-2007, 03:02 PM
"No Rules" is very general.

NSFW area for example, and example only, is a specific section. In "No Rules" you'd have to allow Warez, and I'm sure thats not going to fly with the admins.
Andrew Carnegie
04-11-2007, 03:25 PM
That is a messed up idea. Just like the flame section, it caused alot of hate on this forum

Perhaps instead, a debate section, where people can debate subjects with no flaming of other members at all. That would be good
Plaz
04-11-2007, 04:04 PM
Not happening. I accidentally voted "Yes" fyi.
addc182
04-11-2007, 04:10 PM
No

do you remember what happened last time with the "flaming section"?
Br1k11n118
04-11-2007, 04:27 PM
how bout like in TotalBF2 where they have an off topic section that dosn't add to post count, like have a section where people can post stupid **** but it dosn't add to post count
Mr. Hasselhoff
04-11-2007, 04:28 PM
If I make a spam section I'll disable post count from it. How about that u twat ;)
Plaz
04-11-2007, 04:30 PM
If I make a spam section I'll disable post count from it. How about that u twat ;)

I still disagree with that decision.
Br1k11n118
04-11-2007, 04:33 PM
how bout like in TotalBF2 where they have an off topic section that dosn't add to post count, like have a section where people can post stupid **** but it dosn't add to post count

If I make a spam section I'll disable post count from it. How about that u twat ;)

powned

I still disagree with that decision.

I already said that, rofl j/k haha Anonymous got called a twat! rofl j/k
Mr. Hasselhoff
04-11-2007, 04:46 PM
Well I know I wont. I just want to see his reaction if the only reason he wants it is for spam.
Br1k11n118
04-11-2007, 04:47 PM
Well I know I wont. I just want to see his reaction if the only reason he wants it is for spam.

Isn't that why its called a spam section? lol
incRo
04-11-2007, 05:26 PM
no way

we tried something like this, a total disaster!!!!!
Andrew Carnegie
04-11-2007, 05:36 PM
no way

we tried something like this, a total disaster!!!!!

Because it was a flame section, like it wouldn't be, just for spam, like if it were a flame section I'd post "**** you incRo" but its not. I say we have a spam section and a debate section. That dosn't mean posting "**** george bush" it means like post intelligent debates on political and social issues, like maby a thread about abortion or gay marriage.

No offence incRo
incRo
04-11-2007, 08:25 PM
I agree with you Xaritix but see,
Having a section with "intelligent debates on political and social issues"
would cause the "**** you Xaritix" kinda thing.
anonymouse187
04-11-2007, 08:31 PM
I wouldn't be apposed to a "Unmoderated" section. It would most likely turn into a spam/rage area, though.
Andrew Carnegie
04-11-2007, 08:41 PM
I agree with you Xaritix but see,
Having a section with "intelligent debates on political and social issues"
would cause the "**** you Xaritix" kinda thing.

If it was unmoderated and stuff, there would be the "**** you incRo" stuff. If it was moderated then that wouldn't happen. flaming would result in breaking the forum rules

no offence incRo, rofl