Sweet random argument generator

[Mr. Hasselhoff]

This thing is really sweet!
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

[skepter]

nice find mr hasselhoff

[Rasta/BigBoss]

nice find mr hasselhoff

Exactly

[Mr. Hasselhoff]

Bump, great shit.

[7175 & 455.]

My complaint about porn

The only thing worse than being ignorant is not knowing how ignorant you are. That's porn's problem. I want to share this with you because the best gauge of the value of my attitudes, the sincerity of my convictions, and the force of my will is the hostility I receive from impractical busybodies. How much more illumination does that fact need before porn can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that porn's mercenaries are quick to point out that because porn is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, it is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, porn is a victim of its own success -- a success that enables porn to advocate its tirades amid a hue and cry as ill-bred as it is obstreperous. Porn's ideological colors may have changed over the years. Nevertheless, its core principle has remained the same: to brandish the word "intercommunicability" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that everyone who doesn't share its beliefs is an out-of-touch barmpot deserving of death and damnation. If you don't believe me, then note that if porn continues to obliterate our sense of identity, I will certainly be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. The two things I just mentioned -- the way that porn tries to assert its autonomy by attempting to destroy the lives of good, honest people and the fact that its hangers-on are the biggest distasteful, offensive deceitful-types who have ever dirtied the face of the earth -- may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that its secret passion is to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. For shame! The picture I am presenting need not be confined to porn's asseverations. It applies to everything it says and does.

Now, I don't want to overwork the story about how porn plans to introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods, so let's just say that it cannot tolerate the world as it is. It needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can disabuse porn of the notion that it knows 100% of everything 100% of the time. Porn displays the paranoid malice that is the hallmark of true oligarchism, period. Contentious nymphomaniacs like porn are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, porn labels anyone it doesn't like as "possession-obsessed". That might well be a better description of it. It will not be easy to get porn off our backs. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny? Before I move on, I just want to state once more that porn is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, it frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior, such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to rescue separatism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved. Porn has been trying to convince us that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. This pathetic attempt to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place deserves no comment other than to say that the concepts underlying porn's vulgar memoranda are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as porn's idea that profits come before people is wrong.

It is my fundamental belief that porn has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever it thinks that means) to prove that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its nugatory prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that porn is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to malign and traduce me. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but its sound bites run on pure irony. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we counteract the subtle, but pervasive, social message that says that porn's coalition of despicable junkies and lewd airheads is looking out for our best interests, or is it sufficient to take personal action and end porn's control over the minds and souls of countless people? My answer is, as always, a model of clarity and the soul of wit: I don't know. However, I do know that porn's true goal is to make its maneuvers a key dynamic in modern heathenism by viscerally defining "hexosemonophosphoric" through the experience of rude, reckless fogyism. All the statements that its operatives make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what's happening in the world. During the first half of the 20th century, hooliganism could have been practically identified with sadism. Today, it is not so clear who can properly be called an inconsiderate rotter. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of porn's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. The only way out of porn's rat maze is to act honorably. It's that simple.

[Spart]

WOW I THOUGHT YOU DIED DUDE!!!!!!!

[Kobe]

no lol...it still works

[Spart]

I was referring to the guy that posted before me. he used to be an active poster and disappeared.

[Kobe]

oo ... well that guy posted that 1 year ago,,i think he is still dead

[Spart]

Okay wow I guess I was mistaken and he is dead. I guess someone bumped it with the thread bumper and I thought he posted. I miss that guy. He was fun to talk about pc's with :(

I fail.

[Mr. Hasselhoff]

I used my admin h4X to bump this thread!
<b>edit:</b>
I just saw a link to it and found it useful.

[Spart]

i knew itz.

[Kobe]

pretty useful...

lol Admin H4x bump

[s_8ball]

My complaint about Apple inc.

Before anyone takes umbrage at what I'm about to say, let me explain that I am indisputably not ashamed to admit that by hook or by crook we must dispense justice and encourage others to do the same. By way of introduction, let me just say that according to Apple inc., all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. It might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Apple inc. would realize that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a scary wacko. It's a fact. Truth be told, Apple inc.'s secret passion is to draw unsuspecting nonentities into the orbit of laughable roustabouts. For shame! It is as if we were safely on the bank of a raging river, enjoying a picnic with our friends and family, when a bunch of the worst classes of wayward, snarky twaddlers there are came along and threw us into the river. Not only must we must struggle to avoid drowning in the raging torrent of Apple inc.-sponsored interdenominationalism, but we must crawl out of the river before we can take action.
I leave it to more capable and intrepid folks to explore the full ramifications of Apple inc.'s bromides. But you knew that already. So let me add that if Apple inc. doesn't like it here, then perhaps it should go elsewhere. Apple inc.'s demands are like an enormous priggism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must hinder the power of avaricious, incoherent proletariats like Apple inc., because it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to subject Apple inc.'s smears to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.
It is important to differentiate between vicious polluters and lawless backbiters who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by Apple inc.'s wretched utterances or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with Apple inc.'s surrogates or who maintain contact with Apple inc. as part of serious and legitimate research. Regardless of the theoretical beauty of the notion that there is considerable evidence to show that Apple inc. is serious about wanting to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive, there is the opposing fact that it doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of its editorials in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must reveal some shocking facts about its philosophies. The failure of Apple inc.'s chums to recognize that I am annoyed by the noisome and sometimes psychotic manifestations of rebelliousness against an inherited civilization of which Apple inc.'s slaves do not have the slightest understanding casts doubts upon their methods. I mean, think about it. That's the end of this letter. If I was unable to convince you that each of us should realize after a moment's thought that Apple inc.'s cop-outs are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom, then you should definitely consider contacting me with your supporting or refuting evidence, opinions, personal stories, etc., so that I can make a better argument in my next letter.